Finally, “dissemination of knowledge about effective programs” is another direction to work on. Dissemination of research on effective programs for professionals working with children and adolescents is important to engage professionals to use the developed programs. Similarly, strengthening the communication between the government and prevention scientists is a key to the development of prevention-focused policies. Furthermore, educating the public (particularly parents and adolescents themselves) about the value of prevention will promote the use of such programs. In the long run, credible databases documenting exemplary and promising programs are also important. It is noteworthy that there are no such credible databases in different Chinese communities, including Hong Kong.
Where to Find Credible Sources for Your Research Paper
According to the findings of this study the number of cited articles in ISI/PubMed has increased 1.3 times from 2005 to 2008. This fact could be as a result of revising research polices which offered more credit to the quality rather than sheer quantity. The number of Iranian biomedical journals has increased from 8 to 155 (1979 to 2010) (). The number of Iranian medical journals that are indexed in scientific database increased from 53 in 2000 to 141 in 2008 (). Increased accessibility to scientific data bases, advances in information and communication technology (ICT) and indexing Iranian journals in credible databases have promoted Iranian publication output ().
Finding Credible Sources Online
Non-systematic narrative reviews are comprehensive narrative syntheses of previously published information. This type of literature review reports the author’s findings in a condensed format that typically summarises the contents of each article. Authors of narrative overviews are often acknowledged experts in the field and have conducted research themselves. Editors sometimes solicit narrative overviews from specific authors in order to bring certain issues to light. Although the bibliographic research methodology is an obligatory section in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, it is also becoming an inseparable part of narrative literature reviews. Providing information on the databases accessed, terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria and time limits adds objectivity to the main messages and conclusions. It is advisable to use only credible databases (at least two or three) which only select high-quality publications that contain the most up-to-date information (see ). The best way to organise the analysis of the sources in the main text of a narrative biomedical review is to transform information from the retrieved publications into bibliographic cards with a short description of the main results, level of evidence, strengths and limitations of each study and relevance to each section of the manuscript. Furthermore, the readability of a review can be improved by including a few self-explanatory tables, boxes, and figures synthesising essential information and conveying original messages. We also suggest the use of software packages for reference management, which saves time during the multiple revisions.
Finding Credible Sources Online - Elite Editing